Legal Opinion

Herrin v. White

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1934No. 9444Published

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. It is provided in rule 2 of this court (153 Ga. 890), in relation to the grant of certiorari to a judgment of the Court of Appeals, that “the petition must specify plainly the decision complained of and the alleged errors. It will not be sufficient to set out the contentions and assignments of error made in the original bill of exceptions or motion for a new trial, but it shall be necessary to plainly and specifically set forth the errors alleged to have been committed by the Court of Appeals. A failure to comply with this provision will be deemed a sufficient reason for denying the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TomlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Briesenick v. DimondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API