Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. United Electric Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 27, 1953No. Ex. Nos. 9362, 9363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.

The plaintiffs in these two actions of trespass on the case for negligence, which were tried together to a jury in the superior court, are husband and wife. After verdicts for personal injuries to the wife and for consequential damages to the husband, the trial justice conditionally granted defendant’s motion for a new trial in the case of the former and denied it in that of the latter. The cases are here on defendant’s exceptions to such decisions, to rulings on evidence, and to the charge. Since the husband’s case is necessarily dependent on that of the wife, we shall hereinafter consider…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diehl v. East St. Louis Light & Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  2. Pedroni v. Illinois Third Vein Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anter v. AmbeaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  2. Nelson v. PetroneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. Carpenter v. UNITED ELECTRIC RAILWAYS COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958
  4. Lekos v. Whitehall Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API