Legal Opinion

Butler v. County of Chautauqua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant County of Chautauqua (County) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Plaintiff, an employee of third-party defendant, Holmes and Murphy, Inc., was working on repaving a County highway when his foot was run over by his employer’s roller. Plaintiff testified at his deposition that his attention was distracted from the roller because he was *856warning a pedestrian not to step into its path. Plaintiff commenced this action alleging violations of Labor Law § 241 (6) and §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Lopes v. RostadNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Provenzo v. SamNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Guarino v. Mine Safety Appliance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brinson v. Kulback's & Assoc., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Goldman v. Vanguard Constr. & Dev. Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Leonard v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API