Legal Opinion

Goess v. A. D. H. Holding Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 8, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues to recover from the defendant Benveneda B. Davis $500 with interest from December 20, 1934, upon an assessment levied by the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States pursuant to Revised Statutes, § 5151, title 12 U.S.C.A. §63.

Mrs. Davis had acquired five shares of the capital stock in the Harriman National Bank & Trust Company of the City of New York in October, 1930, for which she paid $7,560.

In September, 1932, she claims to have discovered that the representations made by the president and other officers of the bank upon which she was induced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Oppenheimer v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Ransom v. City of PierreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. Goess v. A. D. H. Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ratner v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  2. Coronado Development Corp. v. MillikinNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API