In re the Estate of Sheehan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Memorandum: We affirm the decree of the Surrogate which denied the admission to probate of two writings alleged to be codicils to the last will and testament of the deceased, Ethel Cabana Sheehan, and which further denied appellant’s *646motion to submit additional evidence relating to the execution of these codicils. The two codicils were properly denied probate on the ground that the facts and circumstances surrounding their execution indicated that both codicils were invalid for lack of publication (EPTL 3-2.1, subd [a], par [3]).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Holcomb v. . HolcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Loder v. . WhelpleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- In Re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of TurellNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EysamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ellis v. Abbey & EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Giammarino v. BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re the Estate of AldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976