Legal Opinion

Insua v. Otero

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 1988No. 87-2099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

Appellant Insua, the defendant below, appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing him from this lawsuit on the basis that he is not a necessary party to the Oteros’ foreclosure action. In their amended complaint the Oteros have sought reformation of an agreement for deed and promissory note and the foreclosure of an agreement for deed. Insua had executed the agreement for deed in order to secure payment of a promissory note for money owed to the Oteros, and this lawsuit arose following a dispute over whether Insua had fully paid the amounts due. During the penden-cy of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chanrai Investments, Inc. v. ClementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API