Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kleefeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment (one paper), Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Marie Lambert, S.), entered September 6, 1989, which, inter alia, granted summary judgment to respondent dismissing petitioner’s claims for attorney’s fees allegedly due from respondent, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to grant summary judgment to petitioner on liability and to remand the matter for an assessment of damages.

Although we agree that petitioner cannot recover on his claim of breach of express contract since the written contingency retainer agreement is not broad enough to include…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. HalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. In re the Estate of KleefeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flemming, Zulack & Williamson, LLP v. DunbarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. In re StorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API