Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Lee Frick and Quimet John Petersen
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1974No. 72-2275PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit-Judge:
Defendants Frick and Petersen were convicted on five counts under 18 U.S. C.A. §§ 2, 371, 1341 and 1343 of conspiring to defraud and defrauding certain persons through a sham loan brokerage business by using the mails and interstate telephonic communications. Only the question concerning the legality of a warrantless search of defendant Frick’s briefcase requires discussion of the reasons for our holding that the search was valid incident to arrest. The other seventeen errors asserted by defendants are subject to affirmance without extended discussion.
The morning after…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. George OchsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. CraveroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Fred "Freddy Campo" Campagnuolo, John "Jackie Campo" Campagnuolo, and Michael "Mike Douglas" GougulesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.