Talmadge v. United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The rehearing presents a question which was not originally submitted and which unfortunately eseapéd our attention'at the time; that arising from the defendant’s incorporation under the laws of the District of Columbia. From this the plaintiff argues that it is a foreign corporation, and as such unable to plead the statute of limitations of New York. Olcott v. Tioga R. R., 20 N. Y. 210, 75 Am. Dec. 393; Rathbun v. Northern Central Ry. Co., 50 N. Y. 656; Boardman v. Lake Shore, etc., R. R., 84 N. Y. 157. The relevant sections of the Civil Practice Act are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boardman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Olcott v. . the Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Comey v. . United Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- National Surety Co. v. RuffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Palmer v. . Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.