N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Senior Judge:
Petitioner N Street Follies Limited Partnership seeks review of a final decision and order of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, which dismissed its application for special exception and variance relief as moot. N Street Follies argues that the agency erred as a matter of law and acted arbitrarily and capriciously in concluding that its application was moot. We reverse.
I
Background
Petitioner wants to build a hotel on several lots that it owns in the 1700 block of N Street, Northwest. The nature of this project requires petitioner to seek approval from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Ukrainian-American Bar Association, Inc. v. James A. Baker, Iii, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Padou v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013