Mandell v. Passaic National Bank & Trust Co.

Leyden, G. 0. J.

This matter presents two motions to strike, one addressed to the amended answer upon the grounds that it is insufficient in law and sham in fact, and the other to the complaint upon the ground that it is sham.

Considering the complaint first, it is in three counts. The first alleges that on and prior to June 19th, 1934, the plaintiff, an infant under the age of twenty-one years, maintained a savings account in the defendant institution; that one *456Samuel Mandell borrowed from the defendant the sum of $1,200 and as collateral security for the loan the plaintiff signed a note for…