Eason v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
The bill of exceptions excepted to the trial judge’s overruling the defendant’s amended motion for new trial. However, the case was not argued orally in this court, and the only ground of the motion for new trial discussed in the defendant’s brief is that “the verdict was without evidence to support it.” Under the familiar rule of appellate practice all other grounds of the motion will be treated as abandoned.
The defendant insists the evidence was entirely circumstantial and not sufficient to support the verdict because it fell short of excluding every reasonable hypothesis…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- John v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Walden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Ivy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.