Legal Opinion

Eason v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 8, 1962No. 21613PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

The bill of exceptions excepted to the trial judge’s overruling the defendant’s amended motion for new trial. However, the case was not argued orally in this court, and the only ground of the motion for new trial discussed in the defendant’s brief is that “the verdict was without evidence to support it.” Under the familiar rule of appellate practice all other grounds of the motion will be treated as abandoned.

The defendant insists the evidence was entirely circumstantial and not sufficient to support the verdict because it fell short of excluding every reasonable hypothesis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. John v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Walden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Ivy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API