Legal Opinion · Dissent

Succession of Heavia

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1876No. 4675Published

APPEAL from the Second District Court, parish of Orleans. Tissot, J.

1Dissent

LudeliNG, C. J.,

(¡Assenting. The creditor of the succession obtained a judgment against the tutrix personally, and caused certain property to *781be seized as bers, under an execution issued against her individually. Whereupon one Stanton sued out a third opposition, claiming that the property belonged to Mm. The seizing creditor, in his answer, alleged that Stanton’s title was simulated.

The only question at issue is' the title of Stanton to the property seized. The Second District Court, which is a probate court, has not jurisdiction in the ease ratione personce and ralione materice.. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawson v. RipleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  2. Badon's Heirs v. FoucherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  3. Henry v. KeaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838
  4. Heyward v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Everett v. M'KinneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API