Legal Opinion

Van v. LLR, Inc.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 3, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00197Unknown

1Opinion

WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA KATIE VAN, individually and on behalf of ) all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LLR, INC., d/b/a LuLaRoe, and LULAROE, ) LLC, ) ) No. 3:18-cv-0197-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion to Strike Twentieth Affirmative Defense Plaintiff Katie Van moves to strike defendants’ twentieth affirmative defense.1 This motion is opposed by defendants LLR, Inc., d/b/a LuLaRoe and LuLaRoe LLC.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary. Background “LuLaRoe is a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  2. INDOOR BILLBOARD WASHINGTON, INC. v. Integra Telecom of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. S.D. Myers, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco and San Francisco Human Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Huch v. Charter Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API