Van v. LLR, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion
WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA KATIE VAN, individually and on behalf of ) all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LLR, INC., d/b/a LuLaRoe, and LULAROE, ) LLC, ) ) No. 3:18-cv-0197-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion to Strike Twentieth Affirmative Defense Plaintiff Katie Van moves to strike defendants’ twentieth affirmative defense.1 This motion is opposed by defendants LLR, Inc., d/b/a LuLaRoe and LuLaRoe LLC.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary. Background “LuLaRoe is a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- INDOOR BILLBOARD WASHINGTON, INC. v. Integra Telecom of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- S.D. Myers, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco and San Francisco Human Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Huch v. Charter Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.