Legal Opinion

Price v. A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1989No. 88-CA-2054PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Defendant, A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. (Copeland), appeals dismissal of his recon-ventional demand against plaintiff, James Price. The issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in ruling that Copeland failed to state a cause of action in his reconventional demand for reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits paid to plaintiff pursuant to a preliminary judgment under LSA-R.S. 23:1316. We affirm.

On February 12, 1985, Price filed a petition1 for workers’ compensation benefits allegedly due as the result of an injury which occurred in the course and scope of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bickford v. LutzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Johnson v. State Through Div. of Admin.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Klein v. RECORDER OF MTG. FOR ORLEANS PARISHLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Darby v. Guastella Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Pearson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nehrenz v. DunnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Dubois v. Diamond M Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API