Price v. A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Defendant, A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. (Copeland), appeals dismissal of his recon-ventional demand against plaintiff, James Price. The issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in ruling that Copeland failed to state a cause of action in his reconventional demand for reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits paid to plaintiff pursuant to a preliminary judgment under LSA-R.S. 23:1316. We affirm.
On February 12, 1985, Price filed a petition1 for workers’ compensation benefits allegedly due as the result of an injury which occurred in the course and scope of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bickford v. LutzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Johnson v. State Through Div. of Admin.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Klein v. RECORDER OF MTG. FOR ORLEANS PARISHLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Darby v. Guastella Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Pearson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nehrenz v. DunnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Dubois v. Diamond M Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990