Greenberger v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
JOHNSON, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the majority’s conclusion that good cause existed to continue petitioner Karen DeLayne Greenberger’s (petitioner) trial. However, unlike the majority, I would conclude the good cause did not extend to permit the trial court to continue petitioner’s trial for an additional half-year thereby forcing her to remain in custody without the benefit of either bail or a speedy adjudication of the allegations against her for almost two years.
I begin my discussion with an explanation of why I believe good cause existed here. I do so because I believe…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.