Legal Opinion
Ramos v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided July 2, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00235Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION RAYNALDO RAMOS PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-235-DPJ-ASH HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND DEFENDANTS INDEMNITY CO., et al. ORDER Plaintiff Raynaldo Ramos and the Defendant insurance companies (collectively “Hartford”) filed eight motions in limine. The Court ruled on most of those in Order [274], one sub-issue to Motion [240] was deferred. This Order addresses the balance: • Hartford’s Motion [237] About Evidence Unrelated to Bad Faith and Motion [262] to Exclude Specific Consequential Damages • Plaintiff’s Motion to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Service Temps Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- James M. O'ReaR v. Fruehauf Corporation, Defendant-Third-Party Fruehauf Distributing Company v. G. G. Espinoza, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Durio v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.