Legal Opinion

Pacific Dock & Terminal Co. v. Los Angeles Dock & Terminal Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 8, 1930No. M-46-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COSGRAVE, District Judge.

On March 30, 1923, D. M. Reynolds, representing the interests that later became incorporated as Pacific Dock & Terminal Company, the plaintiff in this action and which will be called the Pacific Company, addressed a letter to one of the defendants Los Angeles Dock & Terminal Company, which will be called the Los Angeles Company, asking for an option to purchase 220 acres of Long Beach water-front property owned by the Los Angeles Company at a price of $2,000,000.

D. M. Reynolds at all times acted as agent and under authority of the Pacific Company and as its trustee in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Kansas v. Industrial Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Long Beach Dock & Terminal Co. v. Pacific Dock & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API