Legal Opinion

State v. Croft

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 17, 2000No. 98-163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The defendant, Sean Croft, was convicted of first degree assault, see RSA 631:1 (1996), and aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:2 (1996). We affirmed his convictions in State v. Croft, 142 N.H. 76, 696 A.2d 1117 (1997) (Croft I). He appeals the Superior Court’s (Fauver, J.) denial of his motion for new trial based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under the State and Federal Constitutions. The defendant challenges only his conviction for aggravated felonious sexual assault, arguing that his trial counsel’s performance in handling two prosecution witnesses who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. State v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. State v. DewittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. State v. RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KeppleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. State v. PepinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. State v. WaltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API