Legal Opinion
Schlichter Jute Cordage Co. v. Mulqueen
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1906No. 46PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The defendants’ counsel having admitted that the statement of facts contained in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff is ‘‘absolutely correct,” I adopt this statement as the finding of the court. It is as follows:
“(1) Mary O. Mulqueen and Thomas F. Mulqueen, the defendants named In this proceeding, on October 11, 1900, caused a writ of ejectment to be Issued out of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, as of October sessions, 1900, No. 18, against the Schlichter Jute Cordage Company, the complainants in this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shanks v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Mulqueen v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schenk v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Gamble v. HanchettNevada Supreme Court · 1912
- Schenk v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923