Legal Opinion

Kay v. Dean

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1930No. 8 Div. 72PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The suit was on contract, and the complaint consisted of but a single count.

In the opinion in the case of Moundville Lumber Co. v. Warren, 203 Ala. 488, 83 So. 479, our Supreme Court said: “In declaring upon a contract, the pleader must either set out the contract literally or state its legal effect (Davis v. Campbell, 3 Stew. 319, 321), averring the facts showing defendant’s obligation, and, if on parol contract, stating the consideration (B. R. L. & P. Co. v. Littleton [201 Ala. 141] 77 So. 565, 573).”

The complaint, here, was defective in very much the same way as that pointed out in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Moundville Lumber Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Davis & Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1831
  4. Patterson v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. DinsmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API