James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
On January 18, 1994, petitioner-appel-lee/eross-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion of rehearing en banc. The panel majority voted to deny rehearing, Judge Cudahy dissenting. A vote of the active members of the Court was requested on the suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority has voted to deny a rehearing en banc.* The petition is therefore Denied.**
Judges Cudahy, Ripple, and Rovner voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. A dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc follows.
Judge Flaum did not participate in the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard Peters, III and Neil HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard Peters, III and Neil HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.