Legal Opinion

James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 31, 1994No. 92-3618, 92-3711 and 93-2517PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On January 18, 1994, petitioner-appel-lee/eross-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion of rehearing en banc. The panel majority voted to deny rehearing, Judge Cudahy dissenting. A vote of the active members of the Court was requested on the suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority has voted to deny a rehearing en banc.* The petition is therefore Denied.**

Judges Cudahy, Ripple, and Rovner voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. A dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc follows.

Judge Flaum did not participate in the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard Peters, III and Neil HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard Peters, III and Neil HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API