Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Goldstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1941Published

1DissentLoughran, J.

Respecting the People’s accomplice-witness Reles, the trial judge in his charge to the jury said: “ Reles, as a matter of law, is an accomplice, and on his testimony alone there cannot be any conviction. You have heard a lot in this case about accomplices and corroboration, what is this and what is that? Now I will tell you what the law is. The statute says, ‘ A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime.’ That does not mean that there has to be independent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KressNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. People v. . MarendiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. People v. . OdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. People v. FeoloNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. People v. MaioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API