Legal Opinion

Willis v. First Nat. Bank of Burkburnett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1924No. 2310Published

1Opinion

On Motions for Rehearing.

HALL, C. J.

The first contention in appellant Willis’ motion is because there is some evidence in the record showing that another suit is pending in a different court between Willis and the Careys to determine their respective rights and liabilities for the debts of the Carey Bros. Oil Company; that the matter should not have been determined in this ease. If there is any such suit, Willis failed to plead that fact in abatement of E. S. Carey’s cross-action against him herein, and has thereby waived it as a defense. York’s Admr v. Gregg’s Adm’r, 9 Tex. 85; General…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. York's Adm'r v. Gregg's Adm'xTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Blassingame v. Cattlemen's Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Fourth National Bank v. MeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Peck v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API