Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Sutley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1977No. 74 and 75Published

1DissentRoberts, Justice

In 1972, the Legislature enacted the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act [Controlled Substance Act],1 which replaced the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act.2 The Controlled Substance Act substantially reduced the penalties for possession of marijuana. Compare section 13(g) of the Controlled Substance Act3 (imprisonment not to exceed *276thirty days for possession of a small amount of marijuana for personal use) with section 20(c) of the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act4 ("imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement at labor of not less than two (2) or more than five (5) years” for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API