Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Pellegrino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a contested probate proceeding, the proponent appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Czygier, S.), dated February 9, 2005, as, after a nonjury trial, denied probate of a second codicil on the ground of undue influence.
Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the proponent personally.
*523On July 26, 1999 the decedent executed a will in which he left all of his assets to his grandson. A first codicil to the will, dated May 11, 2000, set forth the decedent’s wishes regarding burial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Estate of AntoinetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re MargolisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Estate of IttaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Estate of RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hearst v. HearstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of TenzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re CovielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re NearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re TogninoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011