Legal Opinion

Boston, Bates & Holt v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

The record supports the trial court’s decision that the plaintiff’s attorneys are entitled to a fee for services performed in asserting a subrogation claim on behalf of their client’s insurer against the third party tort-feasor, which decision was reversed by the Court of Appeals.

On May 20, 1989, an automobile owned and operated by Robert S. Beckham was involved in a collision with an automobile operated by Paula L. Coggins. Beckham was insured by Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, the defendant in this case, under a policy that included coverage for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. PritchettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  4. Motors Insurance Corp. v. BlakemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kline v. EyrichTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Marshall v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
  3. Allstate v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Johnetta Nelson v. Innovative Recovery Svcs. Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API