Boston, Bates & Holt v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REID, Chief Justice.
The record supports the trial court’s decision that the plaintiff’s attorneys are entitled to a fee for services performed in asserting a subrogation claim on behalf of their client’s insurer against the third party tort-feasor, which decision was reversed by the Court of Appeals.
On May 20, 1989, an automobile owned and operated by Robert S. Beckham was involved in a collision with an automobile operated by Paula L. Coggins. Beckham was insured by Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, the defendant in this case, under a policy that included coverage for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. PritchettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Motors Insurance Corp. v. BlakemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kline v. EyrichTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Marshall v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
- Allstate v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Johnetta Nelson v. Innovative Recovery Svcs. Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001