Legal Opinion
Alaniz v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 28, 1982No. 13-81-109-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of possession of heroin by a jury which assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, at thirty years imprisonment. We affirm.
In his first three grounds of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred by admitting heroin into evidence which was seized contrary to his rights (1) under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; (2) under Article 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution; and (3) under Article 14.04 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
At the pre-trial hearing on the Motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Acosta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Tovar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Oviedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Wells v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Hoag v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.