Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

United States v. Owen Robinson, A/K/A Heavy, United States of America v. Kendall Schuyler, A/K/A Sleepy, United States of America v. William M. Parros

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 9, 2006No. 03-4511, 03-4518, 03-4519Published

1Concurring in the judgmentNiemeyer, Circuit Judge

While I concur in the judgment remanding this case for resentencing, I cannot concur in the majority’s reasoning in applying the harmless error standard.

Because the defendants were tried, convicted, and sentenced without preserving an Apprendi/Booker * Sixth Amendment error by making a timely objection at trial, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 51, they forfeited their objection except to the extent that they *561are able to persuade us to review the error under the plain error doctrine, see United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). In Olano, the Supreme Court noted:

No…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API