Legal Opinion

Pikwrah v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 2002No. 2D01-5127Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

Gewdat Pikwrah challenges the circuit court order denying his postconviction motion to vacate or set aside his sentence. Pikwrah’s motion was based on the trial court’s failure to warn him that a no contest plea could result in deportation, as is required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(8). We reverse and remand.

To establish a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, a defendant must “prove [1] that the trial court did not provide advice regarding the possible immigration consequences of the plea and [2] resultant prejudice.” Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42, 47 (Fla.2000). Here,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Koenig v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Benelhocine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Orduno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API