In Re Manufacturers Trading Corp. Kiersted v. Hadden (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentMiller, Circuit Judge
Regardless of the advisability of having interlocutory orders appealable as a matter of right, it is now settled under Section 24(a) of the present Bankruptcy Act; Section 47(a) Title 11, U.S.C.A; that the United States Courts of Appeals are “invested with appellate jurisdiction from the several courts of bankruptcy in their respective jurisdictions in proceedings in bankruptcy, either interlocutory or final, * *
I am of the opinion that the order overruling the motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum and requiring the appellant to testify was an interlocutory order in a “proceeding in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Wragg v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re Stanley Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Hedges v. BushnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Hoehn v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.