Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Bailey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 22, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Heffernan, J.), dated March 11, 2004, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Contaratos, S.M.), dated September 2, 2003, which, after a hearing, denied her petition for child support.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Parents of minor children are responsible for their children’s support until age 21 (see Family Ct Act § 413; Matter of Roe v Doe, 29 NY2d 188, 192-193 [1971]). Nevertheless, children of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Roe v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Parker v. StageNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Jones-GambleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Heyn v. BurrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Donnelly v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas B. v. Lydia D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Abidi v. AntohiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Guevara v. UbillusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cricenti v. CricentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rodney v. RodneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.