Legal Opinion

Owen v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1949No. 37,289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

This was an action on an insurance policy. The defendant’s demurrer to the amended petition was overruled and it has appealed.

The record discloses that defendant, a Nebraska corporation authorized to do business in Kansas, on June 21,1927, issued the policy here in question. So far as here pertinent the policy reads:

“Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Association, Omaha . . . Does hereby insure | Insuring Clause | Clarence Owen ... of City of Lincoln, State of Kansas, . . . against loss of time on account of disease contracted during the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noel v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Hildebrand v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Stewart v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owen v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. See v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API