Legal Opinion

State v. Kazanas

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2014No. CAAP-12-0001011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAMURA, C.J.

The use of a criminal defendant’s voluntary statements and admissions as evidence at trial is a critical component of our criminal justice system. Voluntary statements and admissions are reliable. They provide key evidence necessary to solve crimes and facilitate our search for the truth. They provide assurance to the public that the culprit had been brought to justice and promote faith and confidence in our judicial system.

“Voluntary confessions are not merely a proper element in law enforcement, they are an unmitigated good, essential to society’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Credille v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  5. State v. CordeiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Kazanas.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. LockenHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. Kazanas.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API