Legal Opinion

Marks v. Tompkins

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

' Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the faqts.

1Opinion of the Court

Minee, J.:

On August 5, 1889, the plaintiff filed her complaint, alleging ownership and possession of the premises described therein, together with the house and improvements thereon, and that about August 1, 1889, the defendant willfully and maliciously entered thereon, and tore down the said improvements, etc., to the plaintiff’s damage of $1,000. On filing such complaint, an injunction was obtained as prayed for, restraining defendant from entering upon said premises, or in any manner interfering therewith. The defendant’s answer filed September 27, 1890, denies the allegations in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. GarbuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Geary v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Pattison v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1856

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Scoville v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. HartUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Beaman v. Martha Washington Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Smith v. AlfordUtah Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API