Stephen D. Zerschausky v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
Following the successful example of Jackie Washington, 1 2 the appellant at bar claims error in the state trial court’s refusal to admit into evidence testimony of witnesses indicted as accessories. The district court below and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals found the analogy invalid because the appellant here had never sought admission of such testimony. We affirm.
In April 1963 the appellant was convicted in a state district court for murder with malice and was sentenced to thirty years imprisonment. Three potential witnesses at his trial had been charged as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Norton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
- Hardin v. EstelleDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1973
- Ex Parte SelbyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.