Conrad v. Hoch

Valentine, J.,

The plaintiffs on March 6, 1929, leased to the defendant, Claude Hoch, a certain Packard automobile for the term and period of eleven months. Repairs to the automobile were made by Samuel *173Weinstock, to whom it had been delivered for said purpose by Hoch. After the institution of this action, Weinstock intervened as a party defendant, under the provisions of the Act of May 3,1923, P. L. 136, filed a counter-bond, and retained possession of the car, whereupon the plaintiffs procured this rale.

Notwithstanding the language of the Act of 1923, supra,, that if a person found in…