Legal Opinion

Godoy v. Hantman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2003No. CV-02-0390-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This case presents the question whether each party receives a new opportunity to file a notice of a peremptoiy change of judge when the state refiles a criminal matter previously dismissed without prejudice. We conclude that a new indictment begins a separate matter and that the right to a peremptoiy change of judge applies as if no prior action had been filed.

I

¶2 The State charged Defendant Godoy with ten counts of peijury in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-2702 (2001). In May 2001, a grand jury indicted Godoy on nine of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. RoseArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CourseyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. WareNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. John Vincent FitzgeraldArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. Paris-SheldonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Scott Allen Woodington v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API