Legal Opinion

Sakyi v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 6, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1863Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRINCESS SAKYI, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1863 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Upon consideration of the plaintiff Princess Sakyi’s Motion to Extend the Deadline for Class Certification (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 17, the memoranda submitted in support and opposition, and the entire record herein, the plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. The plaintiff initiated this action, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against defendants Estee Lauder…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  3. Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. The Black Panther Party v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Vitamins Antitrust Class ActionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API