Legal Opinion
McCann v. Hazard
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Demurrer to answer in an action for an accounting.
1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.
This is an action in equity, the plaintiffs and the defendants, respectively, representing deceased copartners.
Prior to September 25, 1897, William A. Gildea and Charles Hazard were copartners, engaged in business under the name of The Elmira Roofing Company, located at Elmira, Hew York.
On or about the 25th day of September, 1897, Charles Hazard died, leaving a last will and testament by which he appointed Anna. Hazard, his wife, as executrix, and J ames E. Hazard, his brother, as executor. Said will was duly admitted to- probate on *8or about the 15th day of October, 1897, at which time the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. . WhedonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Milliken v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Town of Mentz v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Lough v. . OuterbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Sherman v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of SauerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915
- In re DunnDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931