Sheridan v. Kennedy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtEager, J.
This proceeding, according to the petitioners, was brought to adjudge the respondent guilty of a criminal contempt. The order herein, without a determination that respondent’s conduct impaired, impeded or prejudiced the rights and remedies of petitioners, adjudged that the “respondent’s disobedience of the mandates of this Court has been wilful and deliberate, and that, therefore, the said respondent * * * is found and hereby held to be in contempt of this Court ”. Thus, it is clear that the order was intended to be and must be considered as an adjudication of criminal contempt.
By virtue of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Spector v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People, Ex Rel. v. . Court of Oyer and TermNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- The People Ex Rel. Negus v. . DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Matter of Rotwein (Goodman)New York Court of Appeals · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holtzman v. BeattyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. FormanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
- Betz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning v. GiulianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Larisa F. v. Michael S.New York Family Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.