State v. Turner

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davts, J.:

This is the second appeal by Curtis L. Turner and follows our remand in State v. Turner, 257 Kan. 19, 891 P.2d 317 (1995), on the sole issue of whether the police activity in making a false statement in the course of obtaining a search warrant was so egregious as to require application of the exclusionary rule to *865Turner’s probation revocation proceeding. The present appeal is from the district court’s finding that the police activity was not so egregious as to warrant application of the exclusionary rule.

The facts are not in dispute and are…