Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Waterbury Trust Co.
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 28, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slater, S.
Upon this accounting a construction of the will is "required.
The last will and testament of the testatrix was admitted to probate May 29, 1917. The question involved is found in article 3, which is as follows:
“ All the rest, residue and remainder of my property and estate of whatever nature and wheresoever situated, I give, devise and bequeath to Charles L. Holmes, of Waterbury; County of New Haven, State of Connecticut, in trust, nevertheless, for the following uses and purposes: To hold, manage and control, lease, mortgage, sell and convey, invest and re-invest as in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Clark v. . CammannNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Lefevre v. . LefevreNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- In Re the Accounting of EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- In Re the Will of BumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re the Accounting of KroossNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- In re the Estate of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- Pyne v. PyneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- In re the Accounting of President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.