Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Budik

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2012No. 84714-2Published

1DissentJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶43 Additionally, the state legislature has the power to determine the tools available to law enforcement in bringing criminals to justice, including criminalizing “obstruct[ing] . . . anyone from performing an act that might aid in the discovery or apprehension” by a law enforcement officer. RCW 9A.76.050(4). If the state legislature chose to further require an affirmative act or statement requirement as part of former RCW 9A.76.070 (2003), it could have done so in the text of the statute. I would hold that there is sufficient evidence to support Budik’s conviction for first degree rendering…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API