State v. Bowser
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINBOTHAM, PJ.
¶ 1. This is a discovery case that arises in the context of a criminal prosecution for possession of child pornography. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the circuit court properly exercised its discretion under Wis. Stat. § 971.23(6) (2007-08)1 in granting the State's motion for a protective order, which allowed Bowser's defense team access *224at a State facility to a computer hard drive allegedly containing child pornography evidence, but prohibited the defense from obtaining a copy of the hard drive.2 We conclude, on the record before the circuit court, and in light…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Jeremy GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- State v. SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MadayCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ScolesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
- Crown Castle USA, Inc. v. Orion Construction Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- State v. BowserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- State v. Charles E. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.