Legal Opinion

State v. Bowser

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 30, 2009No. 2008AP206-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINBOTHAM, PJ.

¶ 1. This is a discovery case that arises in the context of a criminal prosecution for possession of child pornography. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the circuit court properly exercised its discretion under Wis. Stat. § 971.23(6) (2007-08)1 in granting the State's motion for a protective order, which allowed Bowser's defense team access *224at a State facility to a computer hard drive allegedly containing child pornography evidence, but prohibited the defense from obtaining a copy of the hard drive.2 We conclude, on the record before the circuit court, and in light…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Jeremy GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. State v. SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. MadayCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ScolesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. Crown Castle USA, Inc. v. Orion Construction Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  4. State v. BowserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  5. State v. Charles E. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API