Legal Opinion

Barnesboro Finance Co. v. Thompson

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County

Decided May 21, 1949No. 625Published

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J.,

Plaintiff has filed complaint in replevin, to which preliminary objections have been filed. The parties have agreed that notwithstanding the formal objections the only question is as to the sufficiency of the complaint insofar as it relates to the identity of the property covered by the chattel mortgage in question. .

It appears from the pleadings that plaintiff loaned $4,500 to the United Associates, Inc., of Jersey Shore, Pa. As security for such loan a chattel mortgage has been placed on an International TD 40 tractor at that time in possession of the United Associates, Inc.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Twin City Motor Co. v. Rouzer Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Huber v. CloudSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  3. York Ice MacHinery Corp. v. KearneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API