Legal Opinion

City of Zanesville v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1983PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Schnepp, J.

The issue is whether the City of Zanesville, Ohio, may be forced to arbitrate disputes under a broad arbitration provision in a public contract entered into on its behalf by an unauthorized agent in violation of statutory restrictions requiring city council approval and competitive bidding. The essential facts are not in dispute.

On July 22,1980 the assistant director of administration of the City of Zanesville signed a contract for the lease by the city of computer hardware from Mohawk Data Sciences Corporation, the value of which exceeded $5,000. The city…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Granada Buildings, Inc. v. City of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Lion Capital GroupUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. H & R Project Associates, Inc. v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Kerlikowske v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. PHL Variable Ins. Co. v. Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Walentas v. New York City Department of PortsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API