United States v. Kim Tae Sung
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Kim Tae Sung was convicted of selling imitation hair care products with counterfeit trademarks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a). Last year we affirmed this conviction but remanded for resentencing. 51 F.3d 92 (7th Cir.1995). The district court treated Kim as responsible for $960,000 of counterfeit goods, on the theory that he had purchased 20,000 cartons, enough to hold 240,000 bottles, at a retail price of $4 per bottle. Yet the record shows that Kim actually filled no more than 17,600 bottles, placing an upper bound of $70,400 on infringing sales, and lacked supplies essential to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Kim Tae SungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Jorge GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Shengyang ZhouCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Pauly v. Eagle Point Software Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- United States v. Stephen D. LambCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Kim Tae SungDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.