Stanworth v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction under the so-called Bone Dry Act of Alaska (39 Stat. 903 [48 U.S.C.A. §§ 261 — 291]). The sole contention made in support of the appeal is that the act under which the conviction was had has been superseded by the National Prohibition Act (27 U.S.C.A.). It is conceded that this court has decided otherwise in Abbate v. United States, 270 F. 735; Koppitz v. United States, 272 F. 96; Simpson v. United States, 290 F. 963, certiorari denied, 263 U.S. 707, 44 S.Ct. 35, 68 L.Ed. 517; Peterson v. United States, 297 F. 1000, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fukunaga v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Abbate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- United States v. BerkenessSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Koppitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.