Casey v. Casey

The primary issue before us is whether, on the facts of this case, the husband’s military retirement pay should have been treated as a marital asset subject to division. The wife appeals from a February, 2009, judgment of divorce, arguing that the judge erred in treating the husband’s military pension as income, and that the judge’s findings of fact related to property division and child support were not supported by the *624evidence. We affirm in part and reverse in part, remanding for further proceedings in the Probate and Family Court.

Facts.1 The judge characterized this as a long-term…